'; ';

Novak Djokovic vs Rafael Nadal Highlights [Last Game] (US Open 2011 Final)

38 commentaires sur “Novak Djokovic vs Rafael Nadal Highlights [Last Game] (US Open 2011 Final)”

  1. petronije1001 dit :

    Novak has totally fucked up Nadal`s fans` nervous systems! I think you all need a therapist! hahaha

  2. landsurveyrs dit :

    kakvo smece kad slika kasni za tonom

  3. Summon256 dit :

    @serb906 errr…no more like this Djokovic – Federer – Nadal…

  4. serbianpupil dit :

    @spicoli1931 I like your argument he « Federer could have won » the match!

  5. ignatiushand dit :

    Nadal volverá. Con la misma cabeza y las mismas piernas.

  6. UrHeadsMyTarget dit :

    @serb906 lol ya right…

  7. ultrazman14 dit :

    LOL at top comment. Nadal and Djokovic are both talented tennis players, but Fed will always be the greatest.

  8. spicoli1931 dit :

    @Killuminati1996 Not confused. Any shot when you are down 15-40 on match point will largely depend on luck because any shot can be missed (some more than others). « Luck is when u hit a net cord and it goes in, » you just proved my point right there–Fed hit the net cord on 40-30 (match pt 2) and it went out, bringing it to deuce and giving Nole more chances–>bad luck for Fed, good luck for Nole–Fed could have won the match if that shot landed in.

  9. Uros1410996 dit :

    @serb906 …then you wake up and realize your blanket fell off the bed…

  10. Killuminati1996 dit :

    Djokovic was the better rival during majority of the match and made much less errors, which was the reason why he won.

  11. Killuminati1996 dit :

    @spicoli1931 it seems that you are the one who is confused..same thing can be said just about any shot attempted, when a player makes a winner down the line u can say he was lucky cause it went in. I’ve seen tons of similar shots made by djokovic, many against the same player..this shot cant be considered as luck in any way, as he MEANT to hit it, and hes trained to make shots like that. luck is when u hit a net cord and it goes in, or when u hit a moonball and it falls right on the baseline

  12. 3DGNumberOneFan dit :

    @serb906

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah OKAY

  13. 3DGNumberOneFan dit :

    @azncoolboii
    Duh Federer has 16 slams and matches up better against Novak

  14. spicoli1931 dit :

    @Killuminati1996 On 40-30 of that same game Fed hit the net cord and it went out–what if he hit it in a slightly different place and it went in? Or what if he hit the ball just so very slightly above the cord? Djokovic was lucky that Fed hit the cord where he did and it went out, bringing it to deuce and giving him another shot. In that situation, the circumstances (Fed hitting the net cord) were out of Nole’s control, and the outcome favored him…that’s called good luck.

  15. spicoli1931 dit :

    @Killuminati1996 So luck « doesn’t get you out of trouble in professional sports » but it « may help sometimes? » Sounds to me like you are pretty confused. Djokovic’s win was dependent partly on him taking the right shots, but it was also a matter of chance that favored him (luck) on those match points. Yes he hit an amazing forehand, but I bet if he tried to hit that same forehand 10-20 times, he would miss a number of them…his making it that time is luck

  16. TheMorrisania dit :

    STOP THE RACIST GAME : »WHO IS AFFRAID OF THE BLACK MAN » (QUI A PEUR DE L’HOMME NOIR) TO BE TEACHED TO KIDS IN SWISS SCHOOL NOW!
    MY 6 YEARS OLD SON CRIED CAUSE OF THAT,I TOLD THE SWISS SCHOOL BOARD OF WALLIS AND THEY SEAT MY SON NEXT TO A VIOLENT CHILD FOR THAT.
    DONT CONTACT ME TO GIVE ANY EXCUSE OR EXPLANATION TO THIS RACIST GAME!
    I WILL NOT HERE IT .I WILL STOP THIS WHEN I GOT THE WRITTEN COFIRMATION FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD THAT THIS RACIST GAME IS FORBIDEN !

    EQUAL RIGHTS 4 SWISS BLACK KID

  17. rickqp dit :

    nadal was being way too passive during this whole match, he was not attacking the ball as he normally does, instead he was conveniently placing it with high topspin to the center where federer could easily do as he pleased with, and that he certainly did….

  18. hansioung dit :

    00:50 Rafa sobaco

  19. Melancolia793 dit :

    when was last time federer beat nadal?

  20. badthat12 dit :

    hes so competitive its unreal
    

  21. Bloodspiller777 dit :

    youtube.com/watch?v=tD6pPWtBF38

    HUMAN RACES FIGHTER JETS !! Amazingg !!! enjoyyyy !!!!

  22. overratednadal dit :

    Nadal said « Sampras or Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It’s not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve »
    arrogant smug
    clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now
    Fake time-out. cheater. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying. arrogant blind fan

  23. spicoli1931 dit :

    Federer on hard courts > Nadal on clay

  24. cortadew dit :

    @overratednadal I agree with you Nadal has win those GS because the surfaces are getting slower

  25. funkymailfreak dit :

    There is a distinct change in the way Federer is playing the backhand since the last two titles

  26. kitt998 dit :

    i love federer

  27. mjsupafly dit :

    @CeruleanTwist
    fuk u h8er
    u is jus a kopy of dat federahbestklas

  28. MrPernell27 dit :

    @overratednadal well i cant’ stand nadal either, but anyone who watched those sampras ivanisevic matches at wimbledon knows there were extremly boriing. No rallies, points lasted 2-3 strokes, terrible ratings and barely watchable. Nadal is a steroid using, ass picking jackass, and if not for clay he wouldn’t eve be a top 10 player.

  29. XxMaplerzxX dit :

    Guys seriously, stop comparing Federer to Jesus. He is good, but he’s not Federer.

  30. 1986billyk dit :

    @overratednadal yeah nadal needs a dead court to excel. and just defensive out- rally game is the epitome of boooooring .lol

  31. mjsupafly dit :

    @overratednadal
    fuk 2 u u hofomobic peice of shit

  32. overratednadal dit :

    Nadal said « Sampras or Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It’s not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve »
    arrogant smug
    clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now
    Fake time-out. cheater. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying. arrogant blind fan

  33. overratednadal dit :

    @mjsupafly LOL. asshole. ugly gay

  34. mjsupafly dit :

    @overratednadal
    non u is rong
    dis tesin is bowring, nadal is ultimet sexy guy, federerah is ugly dizgusting old ass man

  35. mjsupafly dit :

    @fayezomar
    fuk u

  36. mjsupafly dit :

    @overratednadal
    federeh is stuped pushing bich, al he duz is stey at baslien, playz broing tesin
    u make a eating of mah shitz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  37. mjsupafly dit :

    @overratednadal
    fuk u bich, federah is dumass bich

  38. overratednadal dit :

    @mjsupafly Nadal said « Sampras or Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It’s not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve »
    arrogant smug
    clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now
    Fake time-out. cheater. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying. arrogant blind fan

Portail Emploi | Actualités & Buzz | nt-soft.fr | hotels | iPhone 4G | Resto Job